News by email Donate


Top Stories

Most Read

Popular Videos

World News

Gov rules Crown Prosecution Service was wrong to suggest Bible is ‘no longer appropriate to modern society’

by Kelly Valencia

The Government has admitted the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) should not have branded some verses in the Bible as “no longer appropriate to modern society” in a hate speech lawsuit against a street preacher.

In a written question submitted by Baroness Hoey, the peer asked the government: “What assessment they have made of written statements made in a case by the Crown Prosecution Service that the Bible contains references "which are simply no longer appropriate in modern society and which would be deemed offensive if stated in public".

Baroness Hoey was referring to the case of John Dunn, a street preacher who was charged with a hate crime in 2020 for shouting at two women holding hands: “I hope you are sisters.”

Dunn was acquitted of all charges. However, it was later revealed that, while making the case against the 55-year-old preacher, lawyers for CPS argued that there are some references in the Bible “which are simply no longer appropriate in modern society and which would be deemed offensive if stated in public”.

The remarks sparked controversy among Christians, with some accusing the CPS of overreaching its power.

Now, the government has acknowledged “the statement was inappropriate”.

In response to Baroness Hoey’s question, Lord Stewart, speaking on behalf of the government, said: “The Wessex Area of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has undertaken a post-case review and acknowledges that the statement was inappropriate.

“The statement was not intended to and does not represent a change to published CPS Policy. It is not indicative of a general approach by the CPS to cases involving the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, and the right to freedom of expression.

“As a result of the post-case review, in future, where skeleton arguments are ordered, in cases where there is scope for argument to arise as to rights such as that of freedom of expression, such arguments will be submitted to the Senior District Crown Prosecutor for signing off, prior to service.”

When the remarks were first made public, the CPS said: “On the day of the trial the complainants could not be located to provide vital evidence for the prosecution, which resulted in us offering no evidence.

“It is not the function of the CPS to decide whether a person is guilty of a criminal offence, but to make fair, independent and objective assessments of the evidence to put our case before the court.”


A Monthly Gift Of $11 Makes A World Of Difference

In a world of fake news there’s never been a greater need for quality Christian journalism. Premier’s mission is to provide the Church with the most up to date and relevant news, told from a Christian perspective. But we can’t do it without you.

Unlike many websites we haven't put up a paywall — we want to keep our journalism free at the point of need and as open as we can. Premier’s news output takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. No one in the USA is sharing news like we are across radio, magazines and online so please help us to continue that today.

For a monthly gift of $11 or more we’d also be able to send you a free copy of the brand new Premier Bible, a wonderful Anglicised version of the NLT packed with exclusive bonus content, reading plan and resources to help you get the most out of scripture.

Your monthly support will make a world of difference. Thank you.

Support Us
Continue the conversation on our Facebook page

Related Articles

Sign up to our newsletter to stay informed with news from a Christian perspective.

News by email