Public policy group CARE for Scotland has criticised a letter, by pro-abortion groups, to Scotland's Health Secretary Humza Yousaf calling on the Scottish Government to make "telemedical abortion a permanent and well supported option for care across Scotland."
The letter, organised by Engender and BPAS and signed by several pro-abortion organisations, claims that the impact of the framework introduction during the pandemic "has been overwhelmingly positive" for "women and pregnant people all over Scotland".
CARE, have called the calls for an indefinite extension to the home abortion framework in Scotland "hugely irresponsible" and "a direct threat to women's health."
Nola Leach, Chief Executive of CARE, said in a statement: "Under the new framework, there is far greater scope for women to be forced into having an abortion by a coercive partner. It is hard to establish meaningful and informed consent for medical abortion to take place, given the lack of in-person consultation. And there is a greater risk of dangerous medical complications such as obstetric haemorrhaging occurring.
"There is also a greater risk of later than anticipated abortions occurring at home. During the pandemic, we witnessed hugely distressing cases of women ingesting abortion pills as late as 28 weeks and giving birth to a stillborn baby. This prompted a letter to the Prime Minister signed by more than 600 medics urging the UK government to scrap the scheme.
"The safeguards that existed for access to abortion pills before the pandemic were there for a reason. To protect women from these harmful outcomes. BPAS, Marie Stopes and other signatories to this letter claim to speak in defence of women's health in calling for an extension to the new rules. Tragically, it is quite the opposite."
CARE for Scotland Parliamentary Officer Michael Veitch added: "At its heart, the debate about the home abortion framework is about what level of clinical care should be provided to women in Scotland.
"Whether we support abortion or not, we should want the highest possible standards of safety to be in place. The new framework is simply incompatible with the level of care that should be expected.
"We therefore call on Mr Yousaf to reject these calls and revert to the previous arrangements as soon as Covid is deemed to be under control. It would be unwise in the extreme for interim arrangements designed for the pandemic to become the norm."